Skip to main content
CRITICALSNSSecurity

SNS TopicPolicy Self-Lockout

sns-topic-policy-self-lockout

What this rule checks

Detects AWS::SNS::TopicPolicy resources containing a Deny statement on sns:DeleteTopic, sns:RemovePermission, sns:*, or * with a broad Principal and no NotPrincipal or aws:PrincipalArn carveout for the account root or admin role. Such a policy locks the account out of its own topic โ€” recovery requires breaking glass on the account root credentials to remove the topic policy, or delete-and-recreate the topic if no subscribers depend on its ARN. In fan-out architectures that is often a multi-stack rebuild.

How to fix it

  1. 1Add a NotPrincipal exemption for the account root (arn:aws:iam::<account>:root) or admin role(s)
  2. 2Or use a Condition with StringNotEquals on aws:PrincipalArn to exempt admin role ARNs
  3. 3If the Deny is intended to scope to AWS services, use aws:PrincipalIsAWSService rather than a blanket Deny on Principal: '*'
FlaggedA blanket Deny on topic administration for every principal with no carveout locks the account out of managing or deleting its own topic.
import { aws_sns as sns, aws_iam as iam } from 'aws-cdk-lib';

const topic = new sns.Topic(this, 'Topic');
topic.addToResourcePolicy(new iam.PolicyStatement({
  sid: 'DenyAdmin',
  effect: iam.Effect.DENY,
  principals: [new iam.AnyPrincipal()],
  actions: ['sns:DeleteTopic', 'sns:RemovePermission'],
  resources: [topic.topicArn],
}));
FixedUsing notPrincipals with the account root exempts the root from the Deny, preserving a recovery path while restricting all other principals.
import { aws_sns as sns, aws_iam as iam } from 'aws-cdk-lib';

const topic = new sns.Topic(this, 'Topic');
topic.addToResourcePolicy(new iam.PolicyStatement({
  sid: 'DenyAdmin',
  effect: iam.Effect.DENY,
  notPrincipals: [new iam.AccountRootPrincipal()],
  actions: ['sns:DeleteTopic', 'sns:RemovePermission'],
  resources: [topic.topicArn],
}));

CDK Insights pinpoints the exact file and line in your CDK source for every finding, so you can jump straight to the fix.

Affected resource types

AWS::SNS::TopicPolicy

Compliance frameworks

SOC2NIST

AWS documentation

Read the AWS guidance

Intentional? Suppress this finding

Sometimes a flag is deliberate โ€” a genuinely public endpoint, say. You can dismiss sns-topic-policy-self-lockout and the reason is kept in the report, not silently hidden.

In .cdk-insights.json:

{
  "ignoreRules": [
    { "id": "sns-topic-policy-self-lockout", "reason": "Why this is intentional" }
  ]
}

Or inline in your CDK code:

Validations.of(scope).acknowledge({
  id: 'cdk-insights::sns-topic-policy-self-lockout',
  reason: 'Why this is intentional',
});

Use the rule ID sns-topic-policy-self-lockout shown above โ€” not the CDK-* ID from SARIF / GitHub code scanning. To dismiss every finding on one construct instead, use ignorePaths. Suppression docs โ†’

Catch this in your stack

$ npx cdk-insights scan

CDK Insights runs this and 118+ other rules locally against your synthesised CDK app โ€” free, no account, your code never leaves your machine.

More SNS rules