RDS Backup Retention Low
rds-backup-retention-low
What this rule checks
Detects RDS instances with insufficient backup retention.
How to fix it
- 1Set backup retention period to at least 7 days
- 2Consider longer retention for compliance requirements
- 3Enable cross-region backup replication
import { Stack, App } from 'aws-cdk-lib';
import { Construct } from 'constructs';
import * as rds from 'aws-cdk-lib/aws-rds';
new rds.CfnDBInstance(this, 'Db', {
engine: 'postgres',
dbInstanceClass: 'db.t3.micro',
allocatedStorage: '20',
backupRetentionPeriod: 3,
});import { Stack, App } from 'aws-cdk-lib';
import { Construct } from 'constructs';
import * as rds from 'aws-cdk-lib/aws-rds';
new rds.CfnDBInstance(this, 'Db', {
engine: 'postgres',
dbInstanceClass: 'db.t3.micro',
allocatedStorage: '20',
backupRetentionPeriod: 7,
});CDK Insights pinpoints the exact file and line in your CDK source for every finding, so you can jump straight to the fix.
Affected resource types
AWS::RDS::DBInstanceAWS::RDS::DBClusterIntentional? Suppress this finding
Sometimes a flag is deliberate โ a genuinely public endpoint, say. You can dismiss rds-backup-retention-low and the reason is kept in the report, not silently hidden.
In .cdk-insights.json:
{
"ignoreRules": [
{ "id": "rds-backup-retention-low", "reason": "Why this is intentional" }
]
}Or inline in your CDK code:
Validations.of(scope).acknowledge({
id: 'cdk-insights::rds-backup-retention-low',
reason: 'Why this is intentional',
});Use the rule ID rds-backup-retention-low shown above โ not the CDK-* ID from SARIF / GitHub code scanning. To dismiss every finding on one construct instead, use ignorePaths. Suppression docs โ
Catch this in your stack
$ npx cdk-insights scanCDK Insights runs this and 118+ other rules locally against your synthesised CDK app โ free, no account, your code never leaves your machine.